Ex-CIA Agent Claims US Controlled Pakistan’s Nukes Through Secret Deal With Saudis

Former CIA officer John Kiriakou has alleged that the United States maintained indirect control over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons through Saudi Arabia after a covert deal with scientist A.Q. Khan. In a recent interview, Kiriakou said Washington used Saudi financial leverage to ensure Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal stayed under allied supervision. The claim reignited debate over U.S. foreign interference and nuclear oversight across South Asia amid growing strategic competition.

VIBE NEWS
Your Daily Dose of What's Hot
Ad
Ad
Ex-CIA Agent Claims US Controlled Pakistan’s Nukes Through Secret Deal With Saudis
World • 61 days ago • 1936 views

Ex-CIA Agent Claims US Controlled Pakistan’s Nukes Through Secret Deal With Saudis

IN SHORTFormer CIA officer John Kiriakou has alleged that the United States maintained indirect control over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons through Saudi Arabia after a covert deal with scientist A.Q. Khan. In a recent interview, Kiriakou said Washington used Saudi financial leverage to ensure Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal stayed under allied supervision. The claim reignited debate over U.S. foreign interference and nuclear oversight across South Asia amid growing strategic competition.

TL;DR

  • Former CIA officer John Kiriakou claimed that the U.S. exercised secret control over Pakistan’s nuclear weapons using Saudi Arabia as an intermediary.
  • He said the alleged arrangement involved Pakistan’s nuclear scientist A.Q. Khan and aimed to keep Islamabad compliant with Western security interests.
  • Kiriakou’s revelations, part of a detailed interview, reopened Cold War-era debates about U.S. involvement in foreign atomic programs.
  • Pakistan has denied any external supervision of its nuclear command.
  • Experts cautioned that the claim lacked verifiable evidence but pointed to Saudi funding links to Pakistan’s defence development.
  • The remarks drew sharp regional reactions, with officials in Islamabad dismissing them as “baseless propaganda.”
  • U.S. officials have not issued a formal comment yet.
  • Analysts note the timing may reflect larger geopolitical tensions in Eurasia.

Related News